Monday, 29 December 2025

Organisers of "foam party" in Miri have agreed to withdraw excessive elements, says tourism minister

 

KUCHING, Dec 29 2025: The organisers of a New Year’s Eve celebration in Miri have agreed to withdraw “elements” of the performance that are considered excessive and not in line with oriental customs and culture. 

Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah: Any entertainment programme must be scrutinized in advance by the authorities that give approval, including local authorities and the police.
 

Minister of Tourism, Creative Industries and Performing Arts Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah said the decision was made as a result of discussions between the organisers and the Miri City Council following objections from various parties including non-governmental organisations (NGOs) as well as police reports submitted regarding the contents of the programme.

"As a result of the discussion, I was informed that the performance that was considered excessive has been agreed to be withdrawn," he said yesterday when met by the media at the Sports Village, according to RTM News.

He explained that the organisation of the New Year’s Eve celebration itself is not an issue and can continue, but the contents must be in line with the values, customs and sensitivities of the diverse community in Sarawak.

He stressed that any entertainment programme must be scrutinized in advance by the authorities that give approval, including local authorities and the police, to avoid contents that could spark anger and dissatisfaction among the people.

He also reminded all organisers to be more responsible and not present elements that contradict local culture even though the organisers do not receive allocations from the government.

Yesterday, 12 NGOs had expressed their objection to the holding of a ‘foam party’ for the New Year’s Eve celebration in Miri.

According to the Borneo Post newspaper, the group spokesperson Mohamad Abdullah Jamin said the NGOs had received feedback from the local community expressing unease about the event, said to take place at an open-air venue in the city this Dec 31, as promoted on social media.

He said the organisers had revealed that foreign performers would be invited.

“Based on the videos shared online, their performances seem to not be in line with local societal norms.

The NGOs had urged both the organisers and the authorities to reconsider the ‘foam party’ plan and adopt an approach that would ‘better reflect the identity, dignity and values of Sarawak society’.

 

Najib's conviction for abuse of power is a strong warning to political leaders, says activist Peter John

KUCHING, Dec 29 2025: State’s human rights activist Peter John Jaban reminded political leaders, who are entrusted with governing the country, to take heed of conviction of former Prime Minister Najib Razak by the High Court for abuse of power. 

Peter John Jaban: Najib's conviction is not merely a legal outcome; it is a powerful signal that abuse of power can be challenged, exposed, and judged,
 

He said the law will eventually go after those who abuse their power by enriching themselves and family members, even after they have long retired or forced out of office by the people.

He reminded those still shielded by position, delay, or political convenience: do not mistake the absence of conviction for the absence of scrutiny.

“The people remember. Records exist. History is patient. The people are watching. This is not the end of reform, but a warning and a reminder.

“Impunity thrives only when citizens grow tired. We must not. Accountability must be demanded relentlessly without fear and without compromise,”Peter, who is Saya Anak Sarawak (SAS) founder, said today.

“The recent court’s decision in Najib’s case sends a clear and unmistakable message to the nation.

“This conviction is not merely a legal outcome; it is a powerful signal that abuse of power can be challenged, exposed, and judged,” Peter, who is also the Deputy President of the Global Human Rights Federation (Malaysia), said in a response to the jailing of Najib to 15 years and imposing a fine of RM11.4 billion by the Kuala Lumpur High Country on Dec 26.

He reminded that power does not place anyone above accountability, adding that it was forced into existence by years of pressure, exposure, and the rakyat’s insistence on truth.

“This moment (conviction of Najib)  belongs to the people who refuse to forget, refuse to be distracted, and refuse to accept impunity as normal,” he added.

He said the people acknowledge the unwavering commitment of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) investigators and prosecutors who pursued this case over many years despite pressure, resistance, and repeated attempts to undermine accountability.

He said their persistence demonstrates that corruption can be confronted when institutions are allowed to do their work.

He noted that MACC Chief Commissioner  Azam Baki has publicly recognised these teams for securing the conviction and for the strong cooperation across multiple agencies.

“This collective effort proves that meaningful action against corruption requires courage, coordination, and institutional independence,” he said.

Peter also said that the people salute the judiciary for upholding the rule of law and conducting the trial in a transparent and thorough manner.

“At a time when public confidence is often tested, the courts remain a vital pillar in ensuring that justice is decided by evidence and law not by power or influence.

“Malaysian taxpayers owe their grateful to Justo and Rewcastle Brown for exposing the theft of billions from 1MDB,” he said, referring to Xavier André Justo, a Swiss former banker, and Clare Rewcastle Brown, the editor of a United Kingdom-based whistle-blower Sarawak Report.

He said Justo, a former employee linked to PetroSaudi, came into possession of internal data after falling out with his employers.

He said history often turns not on pure motives, but on access and timing, adding that the information he held was authentic and explosive.

“It revealed the internal mechanics of transactions that would otherwise have remained opaque. “Without this data, allegations surrounding 1MDB would have remained speculative rather than evidential.

“His disclosures provided the raw material that made denial increasingly untenable,” Peter said.

He said Rewcastle Brown, through Sarawak Report, demonstrated credibility, persistence, and courage in publishing and verifying this information, stating that her work involved connecting financial transactions across multiple jurisdictions and continuing publication despite legal threats, intimidation, and political pressure.

“Journalism does not deliver verdicts but without exposure, there can be no investigation, and without investigation, there can be no justice,” he stressed.

He recalled that the core transactions linked to 1MDB began as early as 2010–2011, saying that for years, they attracted little sustained scrutiny not because the sums were small, but because the structure was deliberately complex and cross-border.

“Oversight institutions were politically constrained, and questioning the scheme carried professional and legal risks.

“In such an environment, silence is not accidental ,it is engineered.

“At a time when most mainstream Malaysian media were constrained by ownership structures, licensing laws, and political pressure, Sarawak Report operated outside domestic censorship.

“This external position was crucial. When Sarawak Report and later The Edge began publishing detailed investigations, the public could finally see the scale, intent, and design of the scheme.

“Without this exposure, the truth may never have reached daylight,” he said, adding that the case also highlights the importance of international law-enforcement cooperation.

He said authorities from the United States, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Singapore, the Netherlands, and Barbados played critical roles in supporting Malaysia’s anti-corruption efforts—reinforcing the message that corruption has no safe haven.

He said the court’s decision to convict Najib reminds the people that justice is not automatic—it is demanded.

“Institutions, journalists, and citizens each have a role to play. When the people remain vigilant, accountability becomes unavoidable.

“Without leaked data, foreign-based investigative journalism, and independent domestic media willing to take risks, this affair might have joined the long list of buried scandals.

“We therefore thank local and international media voices who refused to look away,” he said.

Sunday, 28 December 2025

Year-ender: Najib's conviction for abuse of power in 1MDB case caps this year's most memorable major events

Former Prime Minister Najib Razak’s sentence to 15 years in jail and a fine of RM11.4 billion after his conviction for abuse of power and money laundering caps this year’s most memorable major events in the country.

Caption: It is impossible for him to pay the RM11.4 billion  fine, the historic amount that has never been imposed by the Malaysian court on any individual before.
 

He has created a record of sorts for being the first head of federal government to be convicted by the court in relation to abuse of power in the 1MDB case.

That he was fined RM11.4 billion is unprecedented in the country’s legal history against an individual convicted of corruption.

On December 26, Federal Court Judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah, presiding as a High Court Judge, found him guilty of four counts of abuse of power and 21 counts of money laundering involving RM2.28 billion in 1MDB funds deposited in his personal bank account between February 2011 and December 2014.

He was sentenced to 15 years in jail for each of the four charges of abuse of power. However, the court ordered that the jail terms to run concurrently.

Najib was  also sentenced to five years’ imprisonment for each of the 21 charges and ordered him to pay a recoverable sum of RM2.08 billion.

If he fails, he will serve an additional 270 months in prison.

The five-year sentences are to run concurrently with the sentence for abuse of power.

Najib’s jail sentence and fine can be overturned if he succeeds in his appeal in the Court of Appeal or possibly in the Federal Court.

If he fails in these two courts, the last venue is to seek a full pardon from the Yang di-Pertuan Agong.

Otherwise, he will remain in prison for many years. And it is also certainly impossible for him to pay the RM11.4 billion fine.

Najib’s conviction in the 1MDB case came six days after another High Court rejected his bid to serve the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest.

Judge Alice Loke ordered that the disgraced former prime minister will continue to serve his time in Kajang Prison.

She said that the royal addendum order was not valid as it was not deliberated on or decided at the 61st Pardons Board meeting in January last year when the board agreed to reduce Najib’s sentence.

The order did not comply with Article 42 of Malaysia’s federal constitution, which grants the king and state rulers or governors the power to grant pardons, reprieves and respites for offences.

Najib began his jail term in August 2022 after he was found guilty of three counts of criminal breach of trust, three counts of money laundering and one count of abuse of power by the High Court in July 2020.

The charges involved the transfer of RM42 million from SRC International, a former subsidiary of 1MDB  into his personal bank accounts in 2014 and 2015.

He was sentenced to 12 years in jail and fined RM210 million, but the then Yang di-Pertuan Agong Sultan Abdullah Ri'ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah reduced it to six years’ jail and a RM50 million fine just before stepping down on Jan 30, 2024.

The board announced the sentence reduction on Feb 2 last year.

Najib was not the first high-profile politicians to be charged in court for abuse of power, corruption and money laundering.

The  others include former Prime Minister Muhyiddin Yassin, current  Deputy Prime Minister  Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and former Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng.

Muhyiddin faces seven charges of power abuse by soliciting RM232.5 million in bribes and receiving RM200 million in illegal proceeds.

The offences, allegedly committed when he was the prime minister, were linked to the Jana Wibawa project from three companies, namely Bukhary Equity Sdn Bhd, Nepturis Sdn Bhd, and Mamfor Sdn Bhd, as well as from Azman, for the benefit of Parti Pribumi Malaysia Bersaty (Bersatu), of which he its president.

The alleged offences took place at the Prime Minister’s Office between March 1, 2020, and August 20, 2021.

Judge Noor Ruwena Md Nurdin has fixed 29 days for the trial next year.

In the case of  Ahmad Zahid, he was acquitted of all 40 graft charges against him after High Court Judge Yazid Mustafa found that the prosecution had not made out a prima facie case as it had failed to prove the element of graft.

However, Ahmad Zahid was discharged not amounting to acquittal to 47 other charges after the prosecution decided not to proceed.

On Sept 4, 2023, the High Court Judge Collin Lawrence Sequerah acquitted Ahmad Zahid of the 47

charges of criminal breach of trust, corruption and money laundering involving Yayasan Akalbudi funds.

Lim Guan Eng is currently on a corruption trial related to the multi-billion ringgit Penang undersea tunnel project.

He faces multiple charges involving abuse of power, bribery, and dishonest misappropriation of state land.