By Peter John Jaban
The S4S debate will proceed on 10 April 2016 with most of
the parties with seats in the Dewan Undangan Negeri – PBB, PRS, DAP and SPDP –
all running scared from facing the Rakyat.
Only PKR have the courage to send their party leader,
Baru Bian, and SUPP will also send a representative to debate, along with
several other parties contesting in the next election, such as STAR and
PBDS.
The debate remains a chance for the Rakyat to air their
own views and have them heard by the politicians as well as to hear what these
two parties have to say. For those parties which choose not to attend, the
message they are sending is clear: their focus is on winning an election and
safeguarding Sarawak is a distant second.
Therefore, S4S will be suggesting that its supporters
vote accordingly – the election is only one day, the five years in between is
what really counts and the last 53 years have given all the incumbents a very
poor record.
We are not concerned. We see S4S as one force in the
growing political awakening of Sarawak.
After all, our first 22 July protest attracted only a few hundred.
Last year, we
numbered in the thousands and the political elite were forced to act. This
year, who knows? The same goes for the debate. This year we have SUPP and PKR
and a number of other parties displaying the courage to put their money where
their mouth is at the debate.
Next year, when those who chose to dismiss us have seen
the real outcome of their decision, perhaps they will be asking us for an
invitation.”
Norway, the country widely considered to have the best
functioning democracy in the world, conducts political debates in the campaign
period, while in America, political debates are considered an integral part of
the democratic process – even the presidential candidates do not consider them
above it.
In the UK,
petitions with over 100,000 signatures are usually brought up in Parliament and
they have a population of over 60 million; our petition has 300,000 signatures.
Any politician who feels he can afford to put at risk the
votes of 10% of Sarawakians, must be either extremely arrogant or very
confident that the system will deliver the result his way whether he responds
to the Rakyat or not. Given the widespread manipulation of constituencies, both
by numbers and along racial lines, it is no surprise that some of them are.”
Sarawakians are fed up with the feudal mentality of many
politicians in the state. Those who fail
to see the writing on the wall and maintain their ‘Jangan lawan towkay’
approach to the Rakyat are likely to be punished at the polls.
Masing says he has more ‘important priorities’. What is more important than sharing with the
voting public how you plan to safeguard Sarawak? This is why Sarawak is in the terrible state
that it is in, with YBs like Masing looking the other way.
Abang Johari says
the CM does not need to attend. This is
quite true, but equally we do not need to vote for his party. YB Chong has come
up with all kinds of excuses that do not hold up.
If he has the courage to fight, then he must show it. The
event has already received police approval and we have, of course, taken the
appropriate legal advice so it seems somewhat redundant to claim that it is
illegal as a reason for not attending.”
This is a new era in political democracy in Sarawak. In
fact, BN arranged their own debate but the moderator, Idris Buang, spoke more
than the participants!
The older ministers and their style of ‘rule’ rather than
‘represent’, will pass into history as the dinosaurs have because they fail to
see the reality of the age of the internet and egalitarianism. Even those English language dailies that seem
to be boycotting our press statements should be warned that the readers are now
simply going round them, direct to the source.
The Rakyat have let you do it your way for over 50 years
with Sarawak’s rights. You have failed her - Sarawak’s freedoms are in a worse
state than when you took over. So now the Rakyat must force you into a new way
of working.”
The group confirmed it was informed by telephone
conversation with the Chief Minister’s Private Secretary that he still wanted
to meet with them but ‘not yet’. They were further informed that he was unlikely
to attend the debate as he had chosen to put other events first.
We did not ask for a meeting. The Chief Minister
suggested it to the media and we agreed. The group are confused that he now
seems to be backpedalling.
If he was showboating for the media, then we suggest that
politicians should not play so fast and loose with their promises – it is a
poor way to build trust.
However, we maintain that we are open to a meeting if he
is indeed sincere. So far, we have not
received any official confirmation, only the media protestations of the more
junior cabinet members. Whether that is at the Chief Minister’s instigation or
not, remains to be seen.”
Therefore, S4S urges its supporters to move ahead with
this pioneering event and to judge the candidates with the courage to attend on
their actions. Their sincerity on
Safeguarding Sarawak is under the spotlight.
All Sarawakians have seen many political promises crumble
to dust once the polls have been counted. Those that have chosen to ignore this
chance to prove their commitment, have already fallen short. There can be no
greater priority than the future of our state and all political hopefuls should
remember this.
For ticket sales, please contact KC Tan on 016 886
1810. There will be 100 tickets
available free to Political Science university students interested to attend.
Please show your student pass to collect your free ticket.
For further details, I can be contacted at 016 8605272 or KC Tan 016 8861810.
1 comment:
Chickened out politicians... they fear that they will lose their promised of Cabinet seats.
Post a Comment