By Richard Lias
1. Accusations
that the Barisan Nasional ( BN) government marginalised certain races in its
development policy are not true and unfair on the state BN government.
DIG: The
government must be transparent by publishing the fact on the allegation to
prove its sincerity and honesty. A mere statement in today’s world is hard to
believe without hard evidence which we find hard to accept. That’s why in
today’s world, transparency is being pursued as the standard procedure to
guarantee that truth prevails. There is no necessity for the Minister to deny
without facts. The fact that we have points to the contrary. We have quoted the
management of Yayasan Sarawak as a case in point, where Dayak are marginalized.
Another case that we wish to highlight and to which the Minister’s should pay
attention is Land Custody and Development Authority (LCDA), a state statutory
body set up in 1981 with the stated objective to be the catalyst in land
development. If you look into the management line-up of LCDA as published in
its website, you will see that ALL Senior Managers are from one ethnic group.
With this kind of exclusiveness, we could have used a stronger word other than
marginalization. However, we chose not to, out of respect for the Chief
Minister whom we believe is fair minded and inclusive.
2. In
pointing this out, PBB vice -president Datuk Daud Abdul Rahman said raising
racial issues would only create tension among the races and disturb the
political stability in Sarawak that had enabled the state to progress and develop.“No
race is marginalised and it can be proven with the existence of all races
represented in various ministerial and important decision-making posts in
government departments.
DIG: This is
not raising racial issues but promoting justice to all races. Contrary to the
warning of the honourable minister, by exposing injustices and promoting good
governance, it will strengthen and enhance political stability in the state in
an otherwise unstable global environment wrecked by wars and conflicts. The
Minister need not be reminded that what causes political instability is the
continued marginalisation of a section of society and its deliberate
perpetuation inspite of its negative consequences.
3. “Claims
by certain groups that they were marginalised were made because they had not
done enough nor worked hard for success,” said Daud. The Tupong assemblyman
also said many ministers and party leaders from the rural areas proved that
they could succeed in their fields by working hard while representing their
race and becoming the voice of the government.
DIG: This
allegation by the honorable minister reeks of political rhetoric and is not a
factual statement. He has not substantiated his allegation that the
marginalised people are not hardworking.
He overlooks the fact that the process of marginalization is meant to
deprive a society of its potential to progress and succeed.
4. “This
is the concept we want to maintain and there is no divide and rule policy. We
want unity in the state to ensure the state continuously prospers,” he said.
Daud was speaking at the Taman Allamanda Indah Hari Raya open house on Sunday
night.
DIG: The
honorable minster either does not understand political strategy or is just
sidestepping the issue or even denying the obvious. When a section of society
is favoured with benefits while the other sections are not, then that society
has been divided. A society divided is susceptible to any threat of social
disorder. This is why the government must be sincere to the people.
5. He
further elaborated that everyone must understand that no one can be a majority
and claim that they deserve to be winners.“There is no such thing as winner
takes all as everyone has a fair share of the economic cake and I again stress
that efforts to influence people to believe in such unfair policy will only
ruin the state and country,” he said.
DIG: The issue
is not about who wants to get more. We are not asking for what belongs to
others. It is a simple issue of all races to be provided for and treated fairly
by the government of the day. When this is allowed to prosper, then all races
are happy and will surely support the government.
6. He
warned that such approach is a dangerous way of politicking and will in the end
affect the effort of the government to provide development and continue to
reach and serve the people. On the event, Daud lauded the effort by Taman
Allamanda Indah PBB branch and neighbourhood committee to organise the open
house and set residents of other religions to come and participate.
DIG: The honorable
minister must not jump the gun by saying that it is dangerous way of
politicking. Firstly, we are not a political party. We’re just voicing our
concern on behalf of the Dayak community. It seems that the “stoking racial
tension’ has been the standard lame excuse all the time for avoiding issues of
social justice.
7. “We
must learn to accept that we live in a multi-religious country and what is
important is for us to learn to respect each other and everyone will be happy,”
he pointed out.
Among others present at the event was Taman Allamanda
Indah PBB branch chief Ahmad Nahap.
DIG: The
honorable minister himself must not forget that “respect is earned and not
forced”. When we are honest with each
other, when the government is honest with the people, when the members of the
society respect each other, the by product is harmony in the nation. Unless
that is practiced, no matter how much we preach on respect, it will not happen.
Perhaps if the honorable minister wants our respect he
can start by providing hard facts on the following:
(i) The
members of the Board of Directors of Yayasan Sarawak;
(ii) The
top 40 management staffs of Yayasan
Sarawak;
(iii) The
complete list of recipients of Yayasan Sarawak Scholarship from the time it was
set up until today.
What we are trying to promote here is openness in our
society and to encourage those in position and authority to always bear in mind
that society expects them to be accountable. This is not meant to run down
anyone but to start a new era of a responsible and accountable government.
4 comments:
I am a westerner, American, and for a long time I and many others have been astounded at how the Dayaks have been trodden underfoot by a certain 'group'.
The Dayak's land has been taken from them - and is still being taken from them.
Their oil and gas has been taken from them - and sorry, but being given a paltry 5% of YOUR OWN wealth IS the same as theft.
They have their BIBLES stolen from them - yet a certain MB and a certain Sultan refuse to order the thieves to hand them back!
Oh I could go on for pages about the injustices and outright theft, but I will sum it up like this: It is as if Sarawak and Sabah were invaded by Malaya and are now both occupied countries where their citizens have no rights at all.
So, as literally every one of the agreements that formed the basis of Sarawak and Sabah's joining the federation have utterly been broken then the agreement is completely negated. There is no need to secede as there is nothing to secede from. The moment the Malay gov broke all those agreements Sarawak and Sabah automatically reverted back to independant countries.
Good luck to you all and may God bless you all.
Dear American, return all the Indians land. Tq
Two wrongs do not make a right.
Do you not have anything constructive to say?
Do you think it is right what is happening to the Dayaks?
I have stated my view on the plight of the Dayaks - do you have the courage to state yours?
Also, what happened in America happened hundreds of years ago when the WHOLE WORLD was a very bad place - for example, around the time the native American Indians were being treated so harshly the Malay Sultans were literally enslaving, killing, and stealing land from their own people. History should not be allowed to repeat itself.
Also, the native American Indians now enjoy equal rights to every other American, and have done for a long time - and their holy books are NEVER stolen from them. Can the same be said for the Dayaks? No, it cannot.
We are all entitled to our point of view, but if you want your comments to be taken seriously then you should follow the time honored tradition of engaging your brain before you open your mouth.
So disappointing that I was not allowed the common courtesy of a right of reply to the individual who could do no more than make a vacuous attempt to insult me for something that I had nothing to do with and which happened hundreds of years ago - whereas my comment was on what is happening today.
Doubtless this comment will not be published either, as support from myself and other like minded people is clearly not wanted, but is from agitators who want to do nothing more than offend someone who has the courage to speak out against injustice.
Lesson learnt. Goodbye
Post a Comment