KUCHING, Dec 23, 2016 - Sarawak Dayak Iban Association
(SADIA) and Sarawak 4 Sarawakians (S4S) movement are happy to announce that the
case of Rika Herline anak Ji-In, whose identity card has long been outstanding,
is finally settled at long last.
Peter John Jaban (2nd left) and Simon Siah (2nd right) with Rika Herline anak Jiin (centre) and lawyer Chua Kuan Ching (right) at the National Registration Department headquarters.
So far, the two civil movements have assisted seven
candidates, most of whom have made several unsuccessful applications in the
past, to acquire their identity cards, with three out of the seven now able to
access their education once again.
However, most importantly, these applications have all
created an administrative precedent which should be taken forward by the
respective government departments in their goal to solve issues of
statelessness within the rural communities in Sarawak.
Therefore, the two groups call upon Jabatan Pendaftaran Negara,
Majlis Adat Istiadat and the various District Offices to tailor their
administrative requirements better to the needs of the communities that they
serve and to work more closely together to allow genuine applicants their full
constitutional rights and proper recognition of their customary law.
Peter John Jaban, human rights advocate, told reporters:
“We have been given a great deal of support by various agencies: the JPN
taskforce on this issue; the representative from Majlis Adat Istiadat for these
communities and the Penghulu for the area.
"They have done everything within their power to
expedite these cases for the benefit of the community. Our two civil movements will be collaborating
further with these agencies in the future to solve IC issues for other candidates
in Balai Ringin in the new year.
"However, our experience has highlighted several
difficulties for rural applicants in the current system, which goes to explain
the huge numbers of genuine Sarawakians currently living without Mykads.
"Until these administrative requirements are made
more accessible to rural people, the problems will continue. We must ask the three departments to become
more responsive to the needs of the communities that they serve if they are
sincere in wanting to solve the issues of statelessness which still plague
rural Sarawak.
“We have had
access to senior officers who have been responsive, effective and caring and
our thanks go out to them. But this was
not easy to get. We had to fight hard
over several months to get their cases heard by experienced staff.
"In fact, we had to threaten to sue! However, the rural folk do not have the same
treatment from the counter staff who are, in many cases, unaware of procedures
and unwilling to do any more than the bare minimum to solve these cases.
"In some instances, they have even been obstructive,
failing to provide proper advice and assistance and even closing counters early
to go and pick up their children from school.
“Moreover, the process itself, even when applied
correctly, is incredibly taxing for rural folk.
For Rika’s case alone, her family had to find the Penghulu multiple
times and even had to visit the Commissioner for Oaths on three separate
occasions! For many rural families, who
find reading and writing difficult, the system is impossible.
"Of course, the Commissioner for Oaths at the
simpang office in Kuching only operates three mornings a week and there are no
photocopying facilities available on site of any JPN divisional office.
"These difficulties are the reasons why Rika’s
identity card, promised in one month, has taken more than twice that time to
settle.
"Unfortunately, the administrative problems seen
with IC applications are no simpler or more suitable for registration of
marriages so the rural people have another hurdle at that stage. It is no wonder there are so many stateless
children in Sarawak," Peter said.
Simon Siah, lawyer for the families, said: “The problem
in all these cases has not been with the law.
All of these eight cases have been settled with no changes to the
existing legal framework.
"The problem has always been with the administrative
requirements put in place by various agencies to implement the existing
laws. Basically, all these applicants
were rejected because of paperwork, not because they were not genuine
cases.
"Even worse, there seems to be no communication
between the various government departments, so one department is not even aware
of why so many applicants do not have the correct documentation from
another.
"Therefore, genuine applicants are being
consistently turned away with no explanation and no possible solution.
“In each of these
cases, the parents were properly married under Adat, which enjoys the force of
law in Sarawak.
"However, they were being turned away because their
marriage certificates were either not on the correct form or else because they
were not registered with the District Office.
Registration with the District Office is not stipulated in law; it is
only an administrative requirement.
"Unfortunately, this aspect of the administration
has represented a serious stumbling block to many rural people who are required
to travel into town to register with their witnesses and their Penghulu.
"So, many couples who are living together in the
knowledge of their communities, which under Adat makes them married in law,
have simply not completed the registration process and therefore are falling
foul of JPN requirements many years later.
"To make matters worse, the incorrect message is now
being disseminated that Adat marriages are not acceptable and so they are being
coerced into later civil marriages.
"We advise the rural people to travel into town and
register their existing Adat marriages from the date at which they began to
cohabit in the knowledge of their community.
"However, we strongly advise Majlis Adat Istiadat
and the District Office, the agencies tasked with the care of Dayak Adat and
rural communities, to carry out a proper drive, at community level, to register
all existing Adat marriages. This would
mean travelling out to communities rather than requiring impoverished
applicants to travel in," Simon said.
Peter called on
all NGOs dealing with rural communities to work together to help the
stateless.
"We also call on all government departments and
elected representatives to continue to work on this issue for the benefit of
the people they serve.
"The right to a nationality and an identity are
basic human rights, not political tools.
No political party should be using this issue to gain political
mileage.
"These issues should have been solved long ago and
yet they persist. New cases of stateless
children, born to genuine Sarawakian parents, are arising continuously,
carrying through from generation to generation.
It cannot be allowed to continue," he said.
For many rural Sarawakians, Adat is not only law; it is
culture and practice since time immemorial.
It is part of Sarawakian identity.
Therefore, in the same week which has seen rural Dayaks
stripped of their ancestral lands in a ruling by three Federal Court judges who
have no experience and little understanding of the customary practices of the
Indigenous People of the State, SADIA and S4S are calling for a change in
policy and attitude to the status of Adat within government departments.
It is up to these
government departments to safeguard not just the rights of these communities
but also the culture and traditional practices of our state that make us so
special.
Their administrative requirements must be tailored to
recognize citizens’ rights in law but also to allow them to enjoy their
traditions and identities in peace and comfort.
Seven cases have been solved but countless many remain
and until there is a change in policy and the unrealistic administrative
requirements placed on rural citizens, these issues will continue
unsolved.
However, S4S and SADIA and the legal team at Simon Siah,
Chua and Chow Advocates will not give up until all genuine Sarawakian
applicants are enjoying their civil rights, not just under their Adat but also
under the Federal Constitution and even international conventions such as the
United Nations Convention on Elimination of Discrimination against Women and on
the Rights of the Child.
The law exists to protect the people of the State; now we
must ensure that policy and practice do the same.
No comments:
Post a Comment